Image Source: ESPN Deportes
The highly anticipated match between América and Pachuca is facing unprecedented turmoil as the Alcaldía Benito Juárez has announced that the game will be held behind closed doors. This sudden decision has stirred backlash from the club and the Liga MX due to accusations of unfair sanctions.
Closure of Estadio Ciudad de los Deportes
Scheduled for August 30, 2025, this pivotal match was set to showcase two of Liga MX’s top teams. However, the match’s future came into jeopardy when the Alcaldía decided to close the Estadio Ciudad de los Deportes following an incident during a Liga MX Femenil match hours earlier. The controversy erupted when accusations surfaced that the personnel from Club América had overstepped their authority by closing a nearby road during the women’s game.
The Alcaldía claimed that this action was taken without proper jurisdiction, citing safety concerns for families in the area. In response, América categorically denied these claims, stating that they had no security personnel on-site and that it was actually the police of Mexico City who enforced the road closure.
Club América’s Response
América’s management has taken a strong stance, stating: “1) Club América does not have security personnel. 2) The ones who closed the road were police officers from CDMX. 3) This was done in compliance with the safety plan of the Alcaldía. We hope the local authority rectifies this arbitrary act.” The club also indicated that they reserve the right to pursue legal actions due to what they view as an unjust penalty that adversely affects their fans.
Liga MX Reacts to the Decision
The Liga MX has expressed solidarity with Club América while denouncing the closure as an “arbitrary act.” In their statement, they emphasized the need for local authorities to consult with both the league and the team before implementing such significant sanctions. “The Liga MX regrets the arbitrariness committed by the Alcaldía Benito Juárez, which affects the fans and the integrity of the league,” the statement read.
Alcalde Defends the Decision
In a video shared on social media, Benito Juárez’s mayor, Luis Mendoza, defended the rationale behind the closure and rebutted claims of corruption aimed against him. He described the situation as a media campaign designed to undermine his role in ensuring public safety. “My job is to protect local residents, and that will always take precedence over the interests of any television network or football team,” he affirmed.
The Ongoing Fallout
As tensions rise, the league and the club are left scrambling to find a solution that allows the match to proceed smoothly. Both parties are urging the Alcaldía to reconsider its stance to protect the fans’ interests and maintain the match’s integrity. Public sentiment is squarely behind Club América, with many fans voicing their frustrations over the handling of the situation through social media.
This controversial closure raises questions about the boundaries of authority and accountability among local governments and sports organizations. As discussions continue, both América and Pachuca prepare for a match that may unfold in the absence of their loyal supporters, a scenario that has not been seen in the league recently.
Conclusion
With just days until the match, the immediate future remains uncertain. Fans of both clubs eagerly await further updates as the Liga MX seeks a resolution that honors their commitment to the sport and its devoted following.
Frequently Asked Questions
What led to the closure of Estadio Ciudad de los Deportes?
The Alcaldía Benito Juárez decided to close the stadium due to an incident involving security measures during a Liga MX Femenil game, which they claimed posed safety risks.
How has Club América responded to the stadium closure?
Club América has denied any wrongdoing and stated that they did not have security personnel involved in the road closure; they are considering legal action against the Alcaldía.
What is Liga MX’s stance on the situation?
The Liga MX supports Club América and has criticized the Alcaldía’s decision as unfair and arbitrary, advocating for consultation before such actions are taken.
Will the match still happen?
As of now, the match is set to take place on August 30 behind closed doors, pending any changes from the Alcaldía’s decision.
