Image Source: Los Angeles Times
The 25th Amendment is back in the political conversation after President Trump made controversial remarks about Los Angeles and San Diego during a campaign rally in Grand Island, Neb. California officials quickly condemned the comments, while the White House said critics were misrepresenting what Trump meant.
Speaking Monday, Trump discussed the war involving Iran and argued that military action was a necessary cost for protecting the United States and the wider world. He then said Iran could “take out” Los Angeles and San Diego, describing the loss of American cities as “a very small price to pay.” The crowd reportedly cheered.
Why the 25th Amendment Is Being Discussed
The 25th Amendment addresses presidential succession and what happens if a president is unable to carry out the duties of the office. It is not a mechanism for removing a president because of unpopular speech, political controversy or disagreement with policy decisions.
Under Section 4, the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet can declare that the president is unable to discharge the powers and duties of the office. Congress can then become involved if the president challenges that declaration. A two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate would be required to keep the vice president acting as president.
No such action was reported in the Los Angeles Times account of Trump’s rally remarks. There was no indication that the vice president, Cabinet or Congress had begun a formal 25th Amendment process. The issue is instead being raised as part of a broader debate about presidential judgment, national security and the consequences of inflammatory political language.
California Leaders Deliver Explosive Rebukes
California Gov. Gavin Newsom called Trump “deranged and dangerous” in a social media statement. His press office said the president was advocating an attack on more than 10 million residents in two of the nation’s largest cities and argued that the comments were not normal.
San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria also rejected the president’s language. “San Diego is not collateral damage,” Gloria said. “We are not expendable. And we are never a ‘small price to pay.’”
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass described the remarks as dangerous and warned that they could compromise public safety. She said the president’s role is to protect Americans, not threaten them or encourage attacks on American lives.
Sen. Adam Schiff and California gubernatorial candidate Xavier Becerra also criticized Trump. Becerra noted that roughly 13 million people live in Los Angeles and San Diego counties and said their lives should not be treated as a punchline or an acceptable cost.
White House Rejects Criticism of Trump Remarks
White House communications director Steven Cheung pushed back against the criticism. He said Trump was referring to the potential danger posed by a nuclear-armed Iran and argued that the United States is safer because of the administration’s actions.
However, the Los Angeles Times reported that it was unclear whether Trump’s comments were based on intelligence. The report also noted that Iran’s known missile capabilities raise serious questions about whether it could strike the continental United States. The Associated Press previously reported that Iran had imposed a range limit on its ballistic missile program, although U.S. officials have raised concerns about the potential future development of longer-range weapons.
California agencies were also warned earlier in the year that the Iran war could lead to a surprise drone attack in the state. Sources told the Los Angeles Times that there was no credible intelligence supporting such a threat, and officials did not consider the warning reliable.
What the 25th Amendment Could—and Could Not—Do
The 25th Amendment is often mentioned during moments of presidential crisis, but its legal purpose is specific. It is designed for situations in which a president is physically or mentally unable to perform the duties of office, such as a severe medical emergency or incapacitation.
- It does not automatically remove a president after controversial remarks.
- It requires action by the vice president and a majority of Cabinet officials for Section 4 to begin.
- If challenged, Congress must decide whether to sustain the declaration.
- A two-thirds vote in both chambers is required to keep the president from returning to power.
For now, the controversy surrounding Trump’s comments remains political rather than a formal constitutional proceeding. The remarks have nevertheless intensified concerns about presidential responsibility, military rhetoric and the safety of major American cities.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the 25th Amendment?
The 25th Amendment establishes procedures for presidential succession and for temporarily transferring presidential powers when a president is unable to perform the duties of office.
Has the 25th Amendment been invoked against Trump over these remarks?
No. The report provided does not describe any formal invocation of the 25th Amendment by the vice president, Cabinet or Congress.
Can controversial presidential comments trigger the 25th Amendment?
Controversial comments alone do not automatically trigger the amendment. Section 4 concerns presidential inability to perform official duties, not simply political disagreement or offensive speech.
What did California officials say?
Gavin Newsom, Todd Gloria, Karen Bass, Adam Schiff and Xavier Becerra criticized the remarks and rejected the idea that Los Angeles or San Diego could be treated as expendable.